Mad Cow Facts Mad Cow Facts Mad Cow Facts
Mad Cow Facts Home
About Mad Cow Disease
Mad Cow Disease News
Mad Cow Disease Links
Mad Cow Disease FAQ
Contact Mad Cow Facts
Center for Global Food Issues
 
   

BeefTalk: The fire drill - A false positive test

By Kris Ringwall; Beef Specialist North Dakota State University
From Beef Talk -- July 16, 2004

Excerpt -- for complete article, please visit North Dakota State Univeristy.

This article provides a clear explanation of the "inconclusive" test results for BSE recently released by USDA. The author compares the false positive tests to fire drills, a more common form of false positives to which we can all relate. Clearly it is okay to have false positives while it is totally unacceptable to have false negatives.

"People have gradually shifted their thinking toward the concept of absolutes rather than variations within the world. This may not be a major discussion point, but certainly the recent events involving the inconclusive tests for BSE (mad cow disease) remind us that modern technology works. The process may or may not be as simple as everyone would like, but the process works.

A test where the results indicate a positive reading, but in reality the sample is really negative, is not a new phenomenon. False positive test results have been around for a long time.

As testing processes have been developed through the years, two potential errors have always existed, the false positive and the false negative. For a test to have the highest level of accuracy, any occurrence of false negatives, i.e. a sample that is really positive but is not picked up by the test, is totally unacceptable.

False positive results have not been as detrimental as false negatives, and have been allowed to exist, along with subsequent development of additional tests, to help further reduce the incidence of a false positive. The false positive is the process of calling or labeling a sample as positive when in reality the sample is negative.

Can the industry live with false positives? The answer is yes, but the consumer or affected party needs to better understand what test results really mean. In the case of the false positive test for BSE, there was no danger to the food supply and the general public remained safe.

A fire drill is a good analogy to explain a false positive test. Most people should be well versed in the functioning of a fire drill. From the first day of grade school, people are taught what a fire alarm is and what to do when one sounds.

Upon hearing the sound of the alarm, everyone must leave the building or premises. The logic is that the sooner all people leave the premises, the less likely anyone will be hurt in the event of a fire. The principle works and has saved many lives."

Full Story...

 
   
 
Home        About Mad Cow        News & Analysis        Links & Resources        FAQs       SiteMap      Contact